Technology partner for forex & CFD brokers [email protected]+90 530 107 14 49WhatsAppTelegram
Risk

STP vs ECN vs Market Maker: Which Execution Model Should Your Brokerage Use?

Quick answer

An STP (straight-through processing) broker passes client orders to liquidity providers and earns from markups or commissions. An ECN-style broker gives clients access to a pool of competing prices, usually with raw spreads plus a commission. A market maker takes the other side of client trades and manages the resulting risk in-house. Most brokers today run a hybrid model, routing some flow to liquidity providers and internalising the rest, within the limits of their licence.

Key takeaways
  • STP brokers pass orders to liquidity providers and earn markups or commissions.
  • ECN-style brokers show competing prices with raw spreads plus a commission.
  • Market makers take the other side of client trades and carry the market risk.
  • Most brokers run a hybrid model, routing flow by client, size and behaviour.
  • Your licence may restrict which models you can run and what you must disclose.
Our Solution

Looking for broker risk management tools? Exposure monitoring, routing rules and alerts for hybrid brokers.

Explore risk management

The execution model decides how your brokerage earns money, how much risk it carries and which technology it needs.

The three models compared

STPECN-styleMarket maker
Order handlingPassed to liquidity providersMatched against a pool of competing pricesBroker takes the other side
Main revenueMarkup and/or commissionCommission per lotSpread and client trading results
Market riskLowLowHigh; needs active risk management
Key technologyBridge and LPsAggregation, depth of marketRisk management tools

Why most brokers run a hybrid model

A hybrid broker routes flow by rules: for example, larger or consistently profitable clients are hedged with liquidity providers, while other flow is kept in-house within strict exposure limits. This balances revenue and risk. See A-book vs B-book vs hybrid and toxic flow.

Technology you need for each

  • STP / ECN: a liquidity bridge, one or more prime of prime providers, aggregation and execution reports.
  • Market maker / hybrid: real-time exposure monitoring, routing rules, alerts and dynamic leverage.
  • All models: an MT5 white label or other platform, a forex CRM and reporting.

General information only, not legal, financial or tax advice. Each client is responsible for its licences and the laws of every country where it operates.

Frequently asked questions

Both pass orders to the market. ECN-style accounts typically show raw spreads from competing liquidity sources plus a commission, while STP accounts often include the broker's markup in the spread.

Not necessarily. Market making is a legitimate model when properly licensed, disclosed and risk-managed, but it creates a conflict of interest that regulators expect brokers to manage.

A hybrid model, routing some client flow to liquidity providers and internalising the rest within risk limits.

A trading platform, a liquidity bridge, one or more liquidity providers and execution reporting.

Related services

Book a free consultationMore articles